Security
Authentication, authorization, exposed secrets, input validation and vulnerable dependencies.
Home / Rescue AI-built apps
You built something with a tool like Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, Replit, v0, ChatGPT or Claude, and it mostly works. We make it safe to put in front of real users.
If two or more sound familiar, the app is worth a review before you rely on it.
Authentication, authorization, exposed secrets, input validation and vulnerable dependencies.
Error handling, edge cases, data integrity and backups, so one bad request does not take it down.
Making the code understandable and changeable, so you are not afraid to touch it.
Slow queries, wasteful API and AI usage, and hosting bills that grow faster than your users.
Automated tests for the flows that matter, plus alerts so you hear about problems before customers do.
A repeatable, documented way to ship changes safely.
A read-only review of your code and setup. You get written findings, ranked by risk.
A clear recommendation to fix or rebuild, with a fixed scope, timeline and price agreed up front.
We fix the problems and add tests and monitoring. Every change is reviewed by an engineer, with AI-assisted checks on top.
Safe deployment, documentation and, if you want it, ongoing support.
When the data model, login and overall structure are sound. Fixing is faster and cheaper, and keeps what already works.
When the foundations are unsound, patching wastes money. We replace only the parts that need it and keep the rest.
Our promise: we recommend whichever is genuinely better for you, even when that is the smaller job.
The code is yours throughout. Nothing changes in production without your approval.
Yes. The tool does not matter, because we review and fix the code itself. We work from code produced by AI builders and assistants, find what is unsafe or fragile, and turn it into software you can launch with confidence.
You cannot tell from a demo. Typical weak spots are secret keys left in the code, missing checks on who may see or change data, unvalidated input and outdated dependencies. A rescue audit gives you a written, risk-ranked answer instead of a guess.
If the foundations, such as the data model and login, are sound, fixing is usually cheaper and faster. If they are not, patching wastes money. We decide after the audit, and we will recommend whichever is genuinely better for you, even if it is the smaller job.
It depends on the size of the app and how much needs fixing. We start with an audit, then give you a fixed scope and timeline in writing before any fixing begins, so there are no open-ended hours.
Read access to your repository, and read-only access to hosting and databases where possible. We never need your personal passwords, and nothing changes in production without your approval.